LymphedemaV1, Main, Exploration, bibRecord, 00CD41

Prophylactic Lymphadenectomy vs Observation vs Inguinal Biopsy in Nodenegative Patients with Invasive Carcinoma of the Penis

Identifieur interne : 00CD41 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 00CD40; suivant : 00CD42

Prophylactic Lymphadenectomy vs Observation vs Inguinal Biopsy in Nodenegative Patients with Invasive Carcinoma of the Penis

Auteurs : R. Ravi [Inde]

Source :

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology [ 0368-2811 ] ; 1993-02.

RBID : ISTEX:83C90CFB21D311401B4623171EBD0479B41F26FE

Descripteurs français

KwdFr :
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Aine, Biopsie, Humains, Lymphadénectomie, Mâle, Métastase lymphatique (diagnostic), Noeuds lymphatiques (anatomopathologie), Sujet âgé, Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus, Taux de survie, Tumeurs du pénis (), Tumeurs du pénis (anatomopathologie), Tumeurs du pénis (mortalité), Études rétrospectives.
MESH :
- anatomopathologie : Noeuds lymphatiques, Tumeurs du pénis.
- diagnostic : Métastase lymphatique.
- mortalité : Tumeurs du pénis.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Aine, Biopsie, Humains, Lymphadénectomie, Mâle, Sujet âgé, Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus, Taux de survie, Tumeurs du pénis, Études rétrospectives.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biopsy, Groin, Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Lymph Nodes (pathology), Lymphatic Metastasis (diagnosis), Male, Middle Aged, Penile Neoplasms (mortality), Penile Neoplasms (pathology), Penile Neoplasms (surgery), Retrospective Studies, Survival Rate.
MESH :
- diagnosis : Lymphatic Metastasis.
- mortality : Penile Neoplasms.
- pathology : Lymph Nodes, Penile Neoplasms.
- surgery : Penile Neoplasms.
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biopsy, Groin, Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Survival Rate.

Abstract

From 1962 to 1984, 423 patients with invasive penile cancer and negative groin nodes were subjected to prophylactic lymphadenectomies (n113), observations (n258) or inguinal biopsies (n52) in a non-randomised fashion. The numbers of patients with T2, T3 and T4 lesions were similar in the three groups. The overall five-year disease-free survivals were 94, 93 and 85%, respectively. All groin recurrences in the observation group occurred within 18 months of the surgery for the primary tumor. The five-year disease-free survivals of node-positive patients in the lymphadenectomy and observation groups were 100 and 76%, respectively; three patients in the latter group had refused surgical treatment when their adenopathy was mobile. Morbidity from the prophylactic lymphadenectomies included wound breakdown in 61%, wound infection in 18% and lymphedema' in 25% of patients. We feel that neither prophylactic lymphadenectomy nor inguinal biopsy are justified in these patients. Close observation of the groin nodal status would be appropriate.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/document/83C90CFB21D311401B4623171EBD0479B41F26FE/fulltext/pdf

DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jjco.a039608

Affiliations:

Inde

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Prophylactic Lymphadenectomy vs Observation vs Inguinal Biopsy in Nodenegative Patients with Invasive Carcinoma of the Penis</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Ravi, R" sort="Ravi, R" uniqKey="Ravi R" first="R." last="Ravi">R. Ravi</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:83C90CFB21D311401B4623171EBD0479B41F26FE</idno>
<date when="1993" year="1993">1993</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1093/oxfordjournals.jjco.a039608</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/83C90CFB21D311401B4623171EBD0479B41F26FE/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003E22</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003E22</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">003E22</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">004C73</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">004C73</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0368-2811:1993:Ravi R:prophylactic:lymphadenectomy:vs</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">00D780</idno>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:8459642</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">005780</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">005780</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">005780</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">005780</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">005780</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">005780</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">00B596</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">00B596</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">00B596</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0368-2811:1993:Ravi R:prophylactic:lymphadenectomy:vs</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">00D625</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">00CD41</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">00CD41</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Prophylactic Lymphadenectomy vs Observation vs Inguinal Biopsy in Nodenegative Patients with Invasive Carcinoma of the Penis</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Ravi, R" sort="Ravi, R" uniqKey="Ravi R" first="R." last="Ravi">R. Ravi</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Genitourinary Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Madras</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Madras</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0368-2811</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1465-3621</idno>
<imprint><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1993-02">1993-02</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">23</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="53">53</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="58">58</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0368-2811</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0368-2811</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Aged, 80 and over</term>
<term>Biopsy</term>
<term>Groin</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Lymph Node Excision</term>
<term>Lymph Nodes (pathology)</term>
<term>Lymphatic Metastasis (diagnosis)</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Penile Neoplasms (mortality)</term>
<term>Penile Neoplasms (pathology)</term>
<term>Penile Neoplasms (surgery)</term>
<term>Retrospective Studies</term>
<term>Survival Rate</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Aine</term>
<term>Biopsie</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Lymphadénectomie</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Métastase lymphatique (diagnostic)</term>
<term>Noeuds lymphatiques (anatomopathologie)</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
<term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term>
<term>Taux de survie</term>
<term>Tumeurs du pénis ()</term>
<term>Tumeurs du pénis (anatomopathologie)</term>
<term>Tumeurs du pénis (mortalité)</term>
<term>Études rétrospectives</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="anatomopathologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Noeuds lymphatiques</term>
<term>Tumeurs du pénis</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnosis" xml:lang="en"><term>Lymphatic Metastasis</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Métastase lymphatique</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="mortality" xml:lang="en"><term>Penile Neoplasms</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="mortalité" xml:lang="fr"><term>Tumeurs du pénis</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Lymph Nodes</term>
<term>Penile Neoplasms</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Penile Neoplasms</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Aged, 80 and over</term>
<term>Biopsy</term>
<term>Groin</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Lymph Node Excision</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Retrospective Studies</term>
<term>Survival Rate</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Aine</term>
<term>Biopsie</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Lymphadénectomie</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
<term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term>
<term>Taux de survie</term>
<term>Tumeurs du pénis</term>
<term>Études rétrospectives</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">From 1962 to 1984, 423 patients with invasive penile cancer and negative groin nodes were subjected to prophylactic lymphadenectomies (n113), observations (n258) or inguinal biopsies (n52) in a non-randomised fashion. The numbers of patients with T2, T3 and T4 lesions were similar in the three groups. The overall five-year disease-free survivals were 94, 93 and 85%, respectively. All groin recurrences in the observation group occurred within 18 months of the surgery for the primary tumor. The five-year disease-free survivals of node-positive patients in the lymphadenectomy and observation groups were 100 and 76%, respectively; three patients in the latter group had refused surgical treatment when their adenopathy was mobile. Morbidity from the prophylactic lymphadenectomies included wound breakdown in 61%, wound infection in 18% and lymphedema' in 25% of patients. We feel that neither prophylactic lymphadenectomy nor inguinal biopsy are justified in these patients. Close observation of the groin nodal status would be appropriate.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list><country><li>Inde</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree><country name="Inde"><noRegion><name sortKey="Ravi, R" sort="Ravi, R" uniqKey="Ravi R" first="R." last="Ravi">R. Ravi</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/LymphedemaV1/Data/Main/Exploration

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 00CD41 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 00CD41 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Sante
   |area=    LymphedemaV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:83C90CFB21D311401B4623171EBD0479B41F26FE
   |texte=   Prophylactic Lymphadenectomy vs Observation vs Inguinal Biopsy in Nodenegative Patients with Invasive Carcinoma of the Penis
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31.
Data generation: Sat Nov 4 17:40:35 2017. Site generation: Tue Feb 13 16:42:16 2024

Serveur d'exploration sur le lymphœdème

Prophylactic Lymphadenectomy vs Observation vs Inguinal Biopsy in Nodenegative Patients with Invasive Carcinoma of the Penis

Prophylactic Lymphadenectomy vs Observation vs Inguinal Biopsy in Nodenegative Patients with Invasive Carcinoma of the Penis

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

	Serveur d'exploration sur le lymphœdème
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.